Industries/ AI, Data & Compute/ ML Ops & Training

ML Ops & Training on PYRAX

ML Ops covers the pipeline that takes models from training to production — data prep, distributed training, versioning, evaluation, and deployment — and its central weakness is reproducibility: teams and regulators struggle to prove which data, code, and compute produced a given model. PYRAX makes the whole pipeline attestable: PYRAX Compute runs training and eval jobs against a ComputeReceipt, content-addressed storage pins the exact inputs, and eth_getProof makes every artifact and metric independently verifiable.

Market size
$3.4B (2024)
Projection
$39B by 2034 · ~28% CAGR

The market

$3.4B
ML Ops market (2024)
~13%
ML models that reach production
60%+
Enterprises citing reproducibility gaps
~6 months
AI compute doubling cadence

Source: MarketsandMarkets, 2024. Figures are indicative and provided for context.

What's broken today

Training runs are rarely reproducible — the exact data, hyperparameters, and hardware are lost.
Distributed training is expensive and locked to a single cloud's cluster availability.
Model lineage and evaluation metrics are self-reported, so audits and incident reviews are hard to trust.
Regulated deployments (EU AI Act, model risk management) demand provable, tamper-evident records.

How PYRAX transforms it

Concrete network elements mapped to this business.

PYRAX Compute distributed training jobs

Training runs are metered in compute units at 8 PYRX/CU and can shard across a ShardedExecutor cohort, giving teams cluster-scale compute without a hyperscaler contract.

ComputeReceipt for reproducibility

Every training and evaluation job emits one ComputeReceipt binding the data digest, config, code hash, and resulting artifact — a cryptographic record that the run happened as claimed.

Content-addressed model & dataset registry

Datasets, checkpoints, and containers are addressed by hash, so a model version can be traced to the exact bytes that produced it and never silently drifts.

eth_getProof verifiable metrics

Evaluation scores and lineage are committed to state and provable via proofs, so an auditor can verify a model card's claims without re-running the pipeline.

4-rung verification for evals

Benchmark and safety-eval results can be independently re-executed or ZK-proven, replacing self-reported metrics with verifiable ones.

Buildathon: dApp ideas

Ship-ready concepts for ml ops & training on PYRAX.

RepoTrain

01

Distributed training service that returns a ComputeReceipt pinning data, config, and code for a fully reproducible run.

ComputeComputeReceipt

ModelRegistry

02

Content-addressed registry of checkpoints and datasets with immutable, verifiable lineage.

StorageEVM

EvalProof

03

Benchmark harness that re-executes evaluations on independent workers and publishes verifiable scores.

ZKPYRAX Compute

DriftWatch

04

Monitoring dApp that anchors production metrics on-chain and proves when a model has drifted from its baseline.

ComputeReceiptWASM

ShardTrainer

05

Cohort trainer that fans a large training job across pooled consumer GPUs via the ShardedExecutor.

ComputeScheduler

AuditCard

06

Model-card contract whose every claim is backed by an eth_getProof-verifiable artifact for regulators.

GovZK

PipelineEscrow

07

CI/CD for models where each stage escrows PYRX and pays workers on a verified receipt.

EscrowPYRAX Compute

PrivateFineTune

08

Compute-to-data fine-tuning that adapts a base model on private corpora without moving the data.

Compute-to-dataShielded